#1949 Book – Agatha Christie’s CROOKED HOUSE

CrookedHouseAgathaChristi23833_fIt is easy, these days, to think of the classic country house mystery as passé. Trite.  Derivative. But there was a time when this style of story was as fresh and popular as tales of domestic noir are today and the best proponents of the art form could enthrall and surprise even those readers who believed themselves experts in the genre. Agatha Christie penned dozens of variations on this theme but in CROOKED HOUSE, a novel she proclaims a personal favourite in her forward, she has outdone herself.

The setting is, of course, an English country house. When he first encounters Three Gables the book’s narrator, diplomat and son of the Assistant Commissioner of Scotland Yard, Charles Hayward describes it as

It was incredible!…it had a strange air of being distorted…a cottage swollen out all proportion. It was like looking at a country cottage through a gigantic magnifying-glass. The slant-wise beams, the half-timbering, the gables, it was a little croooked house that had grown like a mushroom in the night!…It was a Greek restauranteur’s idea of something English.

Charles’ presence in the house is accepted easily as is the way of things in this type of story. I sometimes struggle to imagine any scenario of my own experience in which a virtual stranger would be given the kind of free reign that characters like Charles always receive when arriving on far-flung doorsteps but, as with all storytelling, you have to willingly suspend disbelief on at least some basic points. So, having ‘connections’ with the police and as the friend (and hopeful husband-to-be) of Sophia Leonides, whom he met in Egypt during the war, Charles is able to introduce the cast – or suspect pool if you prefer – to the reader in a surprisingly natural and believable way.

According to Christie she does not know how the Leonides family got into her head but once there “…like Topsy ‘they growed’“. It’s not hard to imagine that these people were with the author for some time before being brought to life on the page because they are more vivid than many of Christie’s characters. Even Aristide Leonides – who, in something of a departure for Christie, dies within the first dozen pages – is a fully-rounded individual. The Greek-immigrant patriarch of a relatively small family and the requisite number of hangers-on is very much a presence throughout the book. Variously loved, liked or respected by those around him, it is universally hoped that if the man has been murdered then ‘the right person’ is the culprit. Here, thankfully, no one seriously suggests the conveniently passing tramp, but most would be content to learn that any murder was committed by the octogenarian’s second, much, much younger, wife. Not that anyone genuinely hates Brenda Leonides but she is the closest thing to an outsider among the potential suspects and so would be the easiest murderer for the rest of the family to accept.

Of course everyone has a motive for wanting the old man dead but these are delicately teased out and some of them at least surprise with their sensitivity. Christie really does seem to have been giving more than her usual thought to the notion of exactly what it might be that would move someone to become a murderer. In some Golden Age puzzlers the reader is left with the sense that it doesn’t take much for the average person to start throwing poison around with abandon, but here Christie really explores the (far more likely) idea that becoming a murderer is not done with ease unless, perhaps, a person is mentally ill.

In the end CROOKED HOUSE is ‘just’ a deliberately puzzling whodunnit with a finite suspect pool and several twists designed to shock the reader. If that style of story is not your thing at all then there is probably nothing about this particular example that will make you change your mind. If, on the other hand, you don’t mind a classic whodunnit as long as it is well done then I highly recommend CROOKED HOUSE. It puts the vast majority of this type of tale, including some of Christie’s own, to shame in the way it is constructed and while it shares may tropes of the genre it does break with a few traditions. Most pleasingly from my perspective there is no awkward and unbelievable denouement (I can never quite buy the way those play out) and I think that even if the identity of the culprit is deduced beforehand, the actual resolution will surprise most readers satisfactorily.

CROOKED HOUSE was first published in 1949 which made it eligible for this month’s challenge in which readers of the Past Offences blog are invited to review a book, film or other cultural artifact from the nominated year.


This entry was posted in Agatha Christie and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

21 Responses to #1949 Book – Agatha Christie’s CROOKED HOUSE

  1. I’ve just out And Then There Were None on my summer reading list – it will be my first Agatha Christie, but I have a feeling she’s going to gain a new fan!


  2. Kay says:

    It’s been years since I read Crooked House. Love the quote. I think I must add it to my summer reading list. I’m thinking I might have read this one in play format. Years ago, I read a whole book of Christie plays – some original for the stage and some adapted from her novels. I need to read that book again as well.


  3. Margot Kinberg says:

    Oh, Bernadette, I am so glad you enjoyed this one so much, I couldn’t agree more that it has all of the elements of a terrific classic whodunit, and that includes the setting. There is just something about those country houses, isn’t there? And the characters/family members are very nicely done here, in my opinion.


    • There is indeed something about those houses – the year I worked in the UK I actually got invited to a colleague’s husband’s ‘family pile’ for the weekend – it was exactly like one of Christie’s houses and the family weren’t all that removed from the kind that populate her novels (and we were there in the 90’s – I would guess 40 or 50 years earlier the similarities would have been much more apparent). Until then I’d always thought of them as completely fabricated but suddenly realised there was a lot of fact in her fiction

      Liked by 1 person

      • richmonde says:

        Christie was a keen observer of the changing social scene. She stayed in those houses before WWI, and watched as they turned into schools, flats and institutions. Her fiction is firmly based in real life.


  4. eatierney says:

    Great post!! I’ve read a lot of Christie, but I don’t think I’ve read Crooked House. Now, I must!! Thank you!


  5. FictionFan says:

    This has always been one of my favourite Christies – I think her characterisation is far better than it often is, and the motivation aspect is quite chilling. Glad you enjoyed it!


  6. Oh totally agree – this is a good one. I re-read it myself a year of so ago, and was very pleased that it stood up to my memories of it. And as you say elsewhere, just asking to be made into a rather good film….


  7. Your terrific post is great timing for me, Bernadette, as I’ll be running a master class on crime fiction later in the year & I’m looking for ‘classics’ of the genre to illustrate tropes. CROOKED HOUSE sounds like it will combine research & pleasure.


  8. Deborah says:

    I LOVE Agatha Christie and think she was so ahead of her time. Thanks for sharing!!!


  9. tracybham says:

    I was very interested to see how you liked this. It was one of my favorites of the Christie books that I have read in the last few years. I loved the way the ending was handled.


    • So often the endings of novels disappoint me but you’re right this one actually elevated an already good novel – so nice to see it being something out of the ordinary for her – but totally in keeping with the story and its people


  10. Belle Wong says:

    This was one of the Christies I read later in life – when I was in my teens I devoured all the Poirot and Miss Marple mysteries I could get my hands on, but never really bothered with any of the other titles. I really enjoyed it, and now that I’ve read this post, I think it’s time to pull out the audio for another listen.


  11. Richard says:

    I also reviewed a Christie today, CARDS ON THE TABLE, which is another very good one, and with a very small list of suspects: four. I think you’d enjoy it, and it has the added benefit of including four of Christie’s characters: Poirot, Oliver, Battle and Race.


  12. richmonde says:

    Christie makes it clear that this is not the typical English “country house”.


Comments are closed.